Wordsplash!

Each and Every Redundancy

Here's another common phrase that makes me squirm: "each and every." As in, "I love each and every one of my toenails."

People use that phrase all the time ("each and every," not the toenails part), and I'm thinking, isn't that redundant?

Dictionary.com defines each this way: "Every one of two or more considered individually or one by one."

They define every like this: "Being one of a group or series taken collectively; each."

That is not to suggest the two words are identical. The BBC, on its Learning English website, explains the difference between the two words:

" Each indicates two or more objects or people and every indicates three or more. Each can also be used as a pronoun, but every cannot be."

Okay, so there are subtle differences, but using them together is almost always redundant. There's no difference between "I love each one of my toenails," and "I love every one of my toenails." (And to say, "I love each and every one of my toenails," is just plain creepy... but that's beside the point.)

So which is better -- "each" or "every?" I say "each." Why? Fewer words mean tighter writing. With "each," we can use one less word. You can say, "I love each of my toenails," but you can't say, "I love every of my toenails."

[Tune in Wednesday morning for the most ridiculous use ever of the word, "each."]

What Goes Down Can't Be Going Up

The following headline on AOL yesterday struck me as odd:

H&R Block 2Q Losses Soar

I've heard of stocks soaring, but to soar means to fly high. Losses happen when a stock is going down. Can losses soar? I don't think so.